Celebrate Me AI Music Controversy Explained

Tracking the controversy surrounding “Celebrate Me,” a viral R&B song released by the artificial-intelligence musical persona IngaRose and created using the generative AI music platform Suno, including criticism from Bette Midler and other musicians over AI training, compensation and artistic authenticity.

“Celebrate Me” Became A Number-One Hit Despite Being Performed By An AI Persona. The song reached number one on the iTunes charts in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Canada and New Zealand in April 2026. IngaRose is an AI-generated musical persona rather than a conventional human singer, making the song’s commercial success a flashpoint in the debate over synthetic performers competing with human musicians. [FORBES]

The Song Went Viral On TikTok Before Topping The Charts. “Celebrate Me” spread widely through TikTok and had been used in hundreds of thousands of videos by the time it reached number one on iTunes. IngaRose simultaneously developed a large social-media following despite there being no corresponding real-life performer presented as the vocalist. [FORBES]

IngaRose Says The Lyrics Are Human-Written Even Though Suno Was Used To Create The Music. IngaRose’s social-media profile describes its material as containing human-written lyrics and real stories while acknowledging that stems and arrangements are refined using Suno. The distinction has fueled debate over whether the project should be described as AI-generated, AI-assisted or a hybrid of human songwriting and synthetic performance. [THEWRAP]

Bette Midler Called The AI Song “Cultural Genocide.” Midler attacked “Celebrate Me” in August 2026, arguing that although she considered it a good song, its synthetic performance was built from musical styles, vocal techniques and emotional expression learned from generations of human musicians who were not compensated for the use of their work in AI training. She labeled the practice “cultural genocide.” [ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY]

Midler Accused AI Music Systems Of Taking From Human Artists Without Compensation. Midler argued that the machine behind the track had absorbed riffs, phrasing, vocal styles and other creative elements from thousands of musicians while those artists received nothing in return. Her criticism focused not simply on an artificial singer existing, but on the underlying material used to train generative music systems. [THEWRAP]

Suno Acknowledges Training Its AI On Tens Of Millions Of Music Files. Suno’s own training-data disclosure says its music models were trained on tens of millions of publicly available music audio files and associated metadata, including works that may be protected by intellectual-property law. The company maintains that using publicly accessible material for AI training is lawful. [SUNO]

Leaked Suno Code Reportedly Showed The Company Scraping YouTube, Deezer And Genius. Information exposed following a Suno security breach indicated that older company code was used to collect large quantities of music and lyrics from services including YouTube Music, Deezer and Genius. Suno said the code was outdated, while the revelations intensified existing arguments over whether AI music companies improperly obtained material used to train their systems. [TECHCRUNCH]

Suno Has Faced Copyright Lawsuits Over The Music Used To Train Its Models. Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment have pursued copyright litigation against Suno, challenging the company’s use of copyrighted recordings for AI training. Suno argues that training generative models on publicly available music is protected by fair use. The legal dispute gives additional context to Midler’s criticism of “Celebrate Me.” [FORBES]

Natasha Bedingfield Said The AI Vocal Sounded Like Olivia Dean. Bedingfield supported Midler’s criticism and said “Celebrate Me” was “so wrong,” suggesting that the synthetic vocal resembled singer Olivia Dean. No public finding has established that Dean’s voice was specifically copied or used to create the song. [THEWRAP]

India Arie And Amy Sedaris Also Criticized The Song. India Arie reacted negatively to an AI-generated song reaching the charts, while Amy Sedaris also supported criticism of the track. Their reactions added to the broader backlash from performers concerned about synthetic music entering the commercial mainstream. [ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY]

Tyrese Gibson Defended “Celebrate Me” And Rejected Midler’s Criticism. Gibson responded that “AI isn’t going anywhere” and praised the song for inspiring listeners dealing with depression, divorce and other hardships. He argued that human artists should respond by creating better material rather than objecting to AI-generated competition. [ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY]

Gibson Challenged Human Artists To Make A Better Song. Gibson said the AI-generated track had moved him more than much recent human-created music and challenged singers and songwriters to produce something better. His defense turned the controversy into a broader dispute over whether emotional impact or human authorship should matter more when judging music. [THEWRAP]

The Song Accumulated Tens Of Millions Of Streams Despite The AI Backlash. By August 2026, “Celebrate Me” had accumulated tens of millions of streams and IngaRose had attracted a substantial monthly audience, showing that the controversy had not prevented the AI act from achieving significant commercial reach. [ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY]

Relevant YouTube Videos