Amanda Hirsch Polymarket Post Controversy Explained

Amanda Hirsch, the creator and host of the popular Not Skinny But Not Fat podcast, faced widespread criticism in September 2026 after publishing sponsored content for prediction-market company Polymarket tied to the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy.

Hirsch posted the Polymarket partnership on September 4, shortly after a Massachusetts judge declared a mistrial in Clancy’s case. The sponsored video discussed traders’ predictions about whether Clancy would be convicted of murder, while the caption characterized Polymarket as having predicted a not-guilty outcome. Critics accused Hirsch of turning a criminal case involving the deaths of three young children into commercial content. Hirsch deleted the post and later apologized, calling the decision insensitive and a serious lapse in judgment.

Who Is Amanda Hirsch?

Amanda Hirsch is the creator of the celebrity and pop-culture brand Not Skinny But Not Fat. Her Instagram account developed into the Not Skinny But Not Fat podcast, which is distributed by Dear Media and focuses on celebrity news, reality television and pop culture. [Dear Media]

Hirsch also became a host of Hulu’s Get Real, a reality-TV talk and interview program launched in 2026. [Disney+]

She was 37 when the Polymarket controversy occurred. [People]

What Did Amanda Hirsch Post About Polymarket And Lindsay Clancy?

Hirsch published a sponsored Polymarket post on September 4, 2026, as the Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial. In the video, Hirsch said that 36% of Polymarket traders believed Clancy would be convicted of murder and told followers that she had been closely following the case. [USA Today]

The caption accompanying the post said Polymarket had predicted a not-guilty verdict and asked followers whether they were surprised. Hirsch disclosed the commercial relationship with the hashtag #Polymarketpartner. [People] [Us Weekly]

The post was subsequently deleted, although screenshots continued circulating on Instagram, Reddit, X and other platforms. [The Cut] [People]

Why Was Amanda Hirsch’s Polymarket Post Controversial?

The principal criticism was that Hirsch attached a paid promotion to a case involving the deaths of three children. Social-media users objected to transforming speculation about the result of an emotionally charged murder prosecution into advertising for a platform on which people can financially trade on real-world outcomes. [People] [The Cut]

The criticism was not primarily about whether Hirsch disclosed that the content was sponsored. Her post expressly included #Polymarketpartner. Instead, the backlash centered on the subject chosen for the advertisement and the perceived insensitivity of using the Clancy case as promotional material. [Us Weekly] [People]

Critics circulated screenshots and described the partnership as inappropriate because the underlying story involved a mother accused of killing her three young children and a trial dominated by testimony about postpartum psychosis and mental-health treatment. [The Cut] [Reuters]

Did Amanda Hirsch Personally Bet On The Lindsay Clancy Trial?

Published reporting reviewed for this page does not establish that Hirsch personally placed a wager or held a financial position on the outcome of the Clancy case.

Her sponsored content promoted Polymarket and discussed what traders on the platform thought would happen. USA Today reported that Hirsch’s video specifically referred to the percentage of Polymarket traders predicting a murder conviction. [USA Today]

The controversy therefore concerns Hirsch’s paid promotion of a prediction market tied to the case, rather than a verified claim that she personally wagered money on Clancy’s guilt or innocence.

What Is Polymarket?

Polymarket is a prediction-market platform where users trade contracts based on the outcome of real-world events. Markets can concern subjects including politics, sports, entertainment and court proceedings.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission lists QCX LLC, operating as Polymarket US, as a federally designated contract market. The CFTC granted the designation in July 2025. [CFTC]

Prediction-market contracts generally allow traders to buy positions corresponding to competing outcomes, with prices reflecting the market’s implied probability of an event occurring. Polymarket has offered contracts specifically tied to whether Lindsay Clancy will be convicted of murder or manslaughter. [Polymarket]

Did Polymarket Actually Predict That Lindsay Clancy Would Be Found Not Guilty?

Hirsch’s caption simplified what the Polymarket market was measuring. Her video reportedly said 36% of traders believed Clancy would be convicted of murder, while her caption described Polymarket as predicting a “Not Guilty” verdict. [USA Today]

Those are not necessarily identical propositions.

Polymarket’s contract concerns whether Clancy will ultimately be convicted of murder. Under its published rules, a “No” outcome can encompass several possibilities besides a jury returning a not-guilty verdict, including circumstances involving charges being dropped or changed so that no murder conviction occurs. [Polymarket]

The September 4 court outcome was also a mistrial, not a verdict of either guilty or not guilty. [Reuters]

What Happened In The Lindsay Clancy Trial?

Clancy was tried in Massachusetts on murder charges stemming from the January 2023 deaths of her three children. Her attorneys did not dispute that she killed the children but argued she was not criminally responsible because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors argued that her actions were deliberate and that she understood their wrongfulness. [Reuters] [AP]

After nearly six weeks of trial testimony and seven days of deliberations, jurors reported that they could not reach a unanimous decision. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4. [Reuters]

Subsequent accounts from jurors indicated that the panel had divided 11-1, with the majority favoring finding Clancy not criminally responsible. [People]

Clancy remains charged. A hearing is scheduled for September 29 as the defense seeks further relief and prosecutors consider whether to retry the case. [AP]

Had Amanda Hirsch Discussed The Clancy Case Before The Polymarket Ad?

Yes. Hirsch had been discussing the Clancy trial before publishing the sponsored post. Several days before the advertisement, she posted at length about how closely she had followed the trial and about its broader implications for pregnancy, postpartum mental health and the public discussion surrounding the case. [Just Jared] [The Cut]

That prior engagement became part of the backlash. Critics argued that someone who had publicly treated the case as emotionally significant should have recognized the conflict between that subject and a commercial prediction-market promotion. [The Cut]

Did Amanda Hirsch Delete The Polymarket Post?

Yes. Hirsch removed the sponsored content after the backlash began. Screenshots of the deleted material continued circulating and became the basis for much of the subsequent discussion. [People]

Reporting based on Variety’s account said Hirsch returned to posting regular Instagram Stories the following day, which generated additional criticism before she issued a formal apology. [Yahoo/Variety]

What Did Amanda Hirsch Say In Her Apology?

Hirsch apologized publicly on Instagram on Sunday, September 6. She acknowledged that combining discussion of the Clancy trial with a paid partnership was “completely insensitive” and said she should have recognized the problem before publishing the content. [People] [Us Weekly]

Hirsch said that, as a mother, she had become deeply emotionally involved in following the trial and had lost perspective about the appropriateness of using it in an advertisement. She described the post as a “terrible judgment call” and said deleting it did not undo the mistake. [People]

She also said the decision was out of character and apologized to her audience. [Us Weekly]

Did Amanda Hirsch Turn Off Comments On Her Apology?

Yes. Comments were disabled on Hirsch’s apology post. Reporting also noted that criticism continued after the original Polymarket content had been removed. [The Cut] [Yahoo/Variety]

Some critics argued that the apology did not adequately address the broader issue of monetizing a murder trial, while others focused on Hirsch’s admission that she should have recognized the problem before publishing the sponsorship. Those reactions were opinions expressed in response to the controversy rather than factual findings about Hirsch’s intentions. [The Cut]

Did Dear Media Or Polymarket Respond To The Controversy?

The reporting reviewed through September 10 does not show a substantive public statement from Polymarket addressing Hirsch’s specific sponsored post.

Variety’s reporting said Hirsch’s representative did not respond to a request for comment on September 4 before Hirsch later issued her own apology. [Yahoo/Variety]

Hirsch’s Not Skinny But Not Fat podcast remains listed by Dear Media, and she continued her media work after issuing the apology. [Dear Media]

Did Amanda Hirsch Lose Her Podcast Or Hulu Job?

There is no credible reporting that Hirsch was fired from either Not Skinny But Not Fat or Hulu’s Get Real because of the Polymarket controversy. Dear Media continued to list her podcast, while Hulu’s Get Real remained active with Hirsch as a host after the controversy. [Dear Media] [Disney+]

The documented consequences through September 10 were the deletion of the sponsored post, widespread online criticism and Hirsch’s public apology.

Why Did The Amanda Hirsch Polymarket Controversy Get So Much Attention?

The episode combined three subjects already generating intense public debate: true-crime content, influencer advertising and prediction markets. The Clancy case had become a nationally followed trial centered on the deaths of children and competing arguments about severe postpartum mental illness. [Reuters]

Prediction markets, meanwhile, increasingly allow users to financially trade on sensitive real-world events, including criminal proceedings. Polymarket continues to list contracts concerning whether Clancy will eventually be convicted. [Polymarket]

Hirsch’s post put those two worlds directly into sponsored influencer content. The backlash focused on whether events involving deaths, criminal guilt and profound family tragedy should be used as hooks for commercial prediction-market advertising — a criticism Hirsch ultimately acknowledged in her own apology. [People] [The Cut]