Trump’s Popular Vote Compared To Clinton, Obama, And Bush

Final 2016 Election Electoral Vote And Popular Vote Results

Here are some facts about the popular vote margin in the 2016 U.S. presidential election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

Donald Trump lost the popular vote in the 2016 presidential election. As of November 29, 2016, he earned 62,494,202 votes (46.4% of the total). Hillary Clinton got 64,827,442 votes (48.2%), earning her 2,333,240 more votes than Trump.

Donald Trump won the Electoral College, which is what determines the presidency. He earned 306 electoral votes, while Clinton earned 232 electoral votes. 270 electoral votes is the amount needed to win the presidency.

Trump’s Illegal Vote Lie

Trump released a tweet with a lie, claiming that several million votes in the election were cast “illegally.” The independent fact-checking site Politifact rated this a lie and gave their “pants on fire” rating to the claim. Politifact explained, “Neither Trump nor his allies have presented any evidence of widespread illegal voting. In reality, studies have consistently shown that voter fraud is nowhere near common enough to call into question millions and millions of votes.”

Trump’s Landslide Lie

Trump’s campaign chairwoman and spokesperson Kellyanne Conway claimed that Trump’s electoral vote victory was “historic” and a “landslide.” This is a lie as well. Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight explained: “in a historical context, Trump’s Electoral College performance is decidedly below-average.” Silver points out that of the 54 elections since 1804, Trump’s share of the electoral vote ranks 44th.

Trump Electoral Vote Compared To Previous Presidents

Ranked among the winners of the last 10 elections, Trump only got more electoral votes than one president: George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. Trump performed worse than Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama.

Presidents Who Lost The Popular Vote

Four other presidents have lost the popular vote.

1824: John Quincy Adams lost the popular vote by more than 38,000 votes
1876: Rutherford B. Hayes lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 votes
1888: Benjamin Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes
2000: George W. Bush lost the popular vote by more than 540,000 votes

Trump’s popular vote loss of over 2 million votes is the worst performance by a candidate who won the Electoral College in American history.

For more news like this follow on Twitter or Facebook

Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Clinton T-Shirts
Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Clinton T-Shirts

  • TransAmerican

    62M votes for one side, 65M votes for the other side. In either case they each represent less
    than 21% of the governed population – an underwhelming minority.

    Given the differences in the plans (as evidenced below) espoused by the two
    sides of nearly equal size, every side can WIN by a simple divesture – splitting
    the “country” into several virtual nations. As we enter the Knowledge
    Age, the knowledge and technology exists to facilitate such a construct, a new
    world order (e.g. virtual tribalism) in a peaceful and orderly way.

    Otherwise, any single organization pulled apart by disparate visions will
    surely fail – ask any leader of any organization.

    According to Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter On November 8th, “Americans will be voting for this 100-day plan to restore prosperity to our economy, security to our communities, and honesty to our government.”
    According to Hillary Clinton if “elected President of the United States of America in the 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton would be a leader who has the American confidence and optimism that has qualified previous generations to meet the toughest challenges. Hillary would plan to ensure the social welfare of all citizens of this nation and would accomplish this through government changes such as significant tax increases for the wealthy, affordable health care plans for every American, and sufficient support for the Social Security Administration. The position of Commander-in-Chief for this great nation is not one to be abused for its power and prestige. Hillary would fill the role with solely the people’s needs in mind, so that she may aid in protecting the freedom and rights of every United States’ citizen.”